Star Explained

A star is a massive, luminous ball of plasma that is held together by its own gravity. The nearest star to Earth is the Sun, which is the source of most of the energy on Earth. Other stars are visible in the night sky, when they are not outshone by the Sun. For most of its life, a star shines due to thermonuclear fusion in its core releasing energy that traverses the star's interior and then radiates into outer space. Almost all elements heavier than hydrogen and helium were created by fusion processes in stars.

Astronomers can determine the mass, age, chemical composition and many other properties of a star by observing its spectrum, luminosity and motion through space. The total mass of a star is the principal determinant in its evolution and eventual fate. Other characteristics of a star are determined by its evolutionary history, including the diameter, rotation, movement and temperature. A plot of the temperature of many stars against their luminosities, known as a Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (H–R diagram), allows the age and evolutionary state of a star to be determined. A star begins as a collapsing cloud of material composed primarily of hydrogen, along with helium and trace amounts of heavier elements. Once the stellar core is sufficiently dense, some of the hydrogen is steadily converted into helium through the process of nuclear fusion.[1] The remainder of the star's interior carries energy away from the core through a combination of radiative and convective processes. The star's internal pressure prevents it from collapsing further under its own gravity. Once the hydrogen fuel at the core is exhausted, those stars having at least 0.4 times the mass of the Sun[2] expand to become a red giant, in some cases fusing heavier elements at the core or in shells around the core. The star then evolves into a degenerate form, recycling a portion of the matter into the interstellar environment, where it will form a new generation of stars with a higher proportion of heavy elements.[3]

Binary and multi-star systems consist of two or more stars that are gravitationally bound, and generally move around each other in stable orbits. When two such stars have a relatively close orbit, their gravitational interaction can have a significant impact on their evolution.[4] Stars can form part of a much larger gravitationally bound structure, such as a cluster or a galaxy.

Observation history

Historically, stars have been important to civilizations throughout the world. They have been part of religious practices and for celestial navigation and orientation. Many ancient astronomers believed that stars were permanently affixed to a heavenly sphere, and that they were immutable. By convention, astronomers grouped stars into constellations and used them to track the motions of the planets and the inferred position of the Sun.[5] The motion of the Sun against the background stars (and the horizon) was used to create calendars, which could be used to regulate agricultural practices.[6] The Gregorian calendar, currently used nearly everywhere in the world, is a solar calendar based on the angle of the Earth's rotational axis relative to the nearest star, the Sun.

The oldest accurately dated star chart appeared in Ancient Egypt in 1,534 BCE.[7] Islamic astronomers gave to many stars Arabic names which are still used today, and they invented numerous astronomical instruments which could compute the positions of the stars. In the 11th century, Abū Rayhān al-Bīrūnī described the Milky Way galaxy as multitude of fragments having the properties of nebulous stars, and also gave the latitudes of various stars during a lunar eclipse in 1019.[8]

In spite of the apparent immutability of the heavens, Chinese astronomers were aware that new stars could appear.[9] Early European astronomers such as Tycho Brahe identified new stars in the night sky (later termed novae), suggesting that the heavens were not immutable. In 1584 Giordano Bruno suggested that the stars were actually other suns, and may have other planets, possibly even Earth-like, in orbit around them,[10] an idea that had been suggested earlier by such ancient Greek philosophers as Democritus and Epicurus.[11] By the following century the idea of the stars as distant suns was reaching a consensus among astronomers. To explain why these stars exerted no net gravitational pull on the solar system, Isaac Newton suggested that the stars were equally distributed in every direction, an idea prompted by the theologian Richard Bentley.[12]

The Italian astronomer Geminiano Montanari recorded observing variations in luminosity of the star Algol in 1667. Edmond Halley published the first measurements of the proper motion of a pair of nearby "fixed" stars, demonstrating that they had changed positions from the time of the ancient Greek astronomers Ptolemy and Hipparchus. The first direct measurement of the distance to a star (61 Cygni at 11.4 light-years) was made in 1838 by Friedrich Bessel using the parallax technique. Parallax measurements demonstrated the vast separation of the stars in the heavens.[10]

William Herschel was the first astronomer to attempt to determine the distribution of stars in the sky. During the 1780s, he performed a series of gauges in 600 directions, and counted the stars observed along each line of sight. From this he deduced that the number of stars steadily increased toward one side of the sky, in the direction of the Milky Way core. His son John Herschel repeated this study in the southern hemisphere and found a corresponding increase in the same direction.[13] In addition to his other accomplishments, William Herschel is also noted for his discovery that some stars do not merely lie along the same line of sight, but are also physical companions that form binary star systems.

The science of stellar spectroscopy was pioneered by Joseph von Fraunhofer and Angelo Secchi. By comparing the spectra of stars such as Sirius to the Sun, they found differences in the strength and number of their absorption lines - the dark lines in a stellar spectra due to the absorption of specific frequencies by the atmosphere. In 1865 Secchi began classifying stars into spectral types.[14] However, the modern version of the stellar classification scheme was developed by Annie J. Cannon during the 1900s.

Observation of double stars gained increasing importance during the 19th century. In 1834, Friedrich Bessel observed changes in the proper motion of the star Sirius, and inferred a hidden companion. Edward Pickering discovered the first spectroscopic binary in 1899 when he observed the periodic splitting of the spectral lines of the star Mizar in a 104 day period. Detailed observations of many binary star systems were collected by astronomers such as William Struve and S. W. Burnham, allowing the masses of stars to be determined from computation of the orbital elements. The first solution to the problem of deriving an orbit of binary stars from telescope observations was made by Felix Savary in 1827.[15]

The twentieth century saw increasingly rapid advances in the scientific study of stars. The photograph became a valuable astronomical tool. Karl Schwarzschild discovered that the color of a star, and hence its temperature, could be determined by comparing the visual magnitude against the photographic magnitude. The development of the photoelectric photometer allowed very precise measurements of magnitude at multiple wavelength intervals. In 1921 Albert A. Michelson made the first measurements of a stellar diameter using an interferometer on the Hooker telescope.[16]

Important conceptual work on the physical basis of stars occurred during the first decades of the twentieth century. In 1913, the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram was developed, propelling the astrophysical study of stars. Successful models were developed to explain the interiors of stars and stellar evolution. The spectra of stars were also successfully explained through advances in quantum physics. This allowed the chemical composition of the stellar atmosphere to be determined.[17]

With the exception of supernovae, individual stars have primarily been observed in our Local Group of galaxies,[18] and especially in the visible part of the Milky Way (as demonstrated by the detailed star catalogues available for ourgalaxy[19]). But some stars have been observed in the M100 galaxy of the Virgo Cluster, about 100 million light years from the Earth.[20] In the Local Supercluster it is possible to see star clusters, and current telescopes could in principle observe faint individual stars in the Local Cluster - the most distant stars resolved have up to hundred million light years away[21] (see Cepheids). However, outside the Local Supercluster of galaxies, neither individual stars nor clusters of stars have been observed. The only exception is a faint image of a large star cluster containing hundreds of thousands of stars located one billion light years away[22] - ten times the distance of the most distant star cluster previously observed.

Star designations

See main article: Star designation, Astronomical naming conventions and Star catalogue. The concept of the constellation was known to exist during the Babylonian period. Ancient sky watchers imagined that prominent arrangements of stars formed patterns, and they associated these with particular aspects of nature or their myths. Twelve of these formations lay along the band of the ecliptic and these became the basis of astrology. Many of the more prominent individual stars were also given names, particularly with Arabic or Latin designations.

As well as certain constellations and the Sun itself, stars as a whole have their own myths.[23] They were thought to be the souls of the dead or gods. An example is the star Algol, which was thought to represent the eye of the Gorgon Medusa.

To the Ancient Greeks, some "stars," known as planets (Greek πλανήτης (planētēs), meaning "wanderer"), represented various important deities, from which the names of the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn were taken.[23] (Uranus and Neptune were also Greek and Roman gods, but neither planet was known in Antiquity because of their low brightness. Their names were assigned by later astronomers).

Circa 1600, the names of the constellations were used to name the stars in the corresponding regions of the sky. The German astronomer Johann Bayer created a series of star maps and applied Greek letters as designations to the stars in each constellation. Later a numbering system based on the star's right ascension was invented and added to John Flamsteed's star catalogue in his book "Historia coelestis Britannica" (the 1712 edition), whereby this numbering system came to be called Flamsteed designation or Flamsteed numbering.[24] [25]

The only body which has been recognized by the scientific community as having the authority to name stars or other celestial bodies is the International Astronomical Union (IAU).[26] A number of private companies (for instance, the "International Star Registry") purport to sell names to stars; however, these names are neither recognized by the scientific community nor used by them,[26] and many in the astronomy community view these organizations as frauds preying on people ignorant of star naming procedure.[27]

Units of measurement

Most stellar parameters are expressed in SI units by convention, but CGS units are also used (e.g., expressing luminosity in ergs per second). Mass, luminosity, and radii are usually given in solar units, based on the characteristics of the Sun:

solar mass

\begin{smallmatrix}M\odot=1.9891 x 1030\end{smallmatrix}

solar luminosity

\begin{smallmatrix}L\odot=3.827 x 1026\end{smallmatrix}

solar radius

\begin{smallmatrix}R\odot=6.960 x 108\end{smallmatrix}


Large lengths, such as the radius of a giant star or the semi-major axis of a binary star system, are often expressed in terms of the astronomical unit (AU) - approximately the mean distance between the Earth and the Sun (150 million km or 93 million miles).

Formation and evolution

See main article: Stellar evolution. Stars are formed within extended regions of higher density in the interstellar medium, although the density is still lower than the inside of an earthly vacuum chamber. These regions are called molecular clouds and consist mostly of hydrogen, with about 23 - 28% helium and a few percent heavier elements. One example of such a star-forming region is the Orion Nebula.[30] As massive stars are formed from molecular clouds, they powerfully illuminate those clouds. They also ionize the hydrogen, creating an H II region.

Protostar formation

See main article: Star formation. The formation of a star begins with a gravitational instability inside a molecular cloud, often triggered by shock waves from supernovae (massive stellar explosions) or the collision of two galaxies (as in a starburst galaxy). Once a region reaches a sufficient density of matter to satisfy the criteria for Jeans Instability it begins to collapse under its own gravitational force.

As the cloud collapses, individual conglomerations of dense dust and gas form what are known as Bok globules. These can contain up to 50 solar masses of material. As a globule collapses and the density increases, the gravitational energy is converted into heat and the temperature rises. When the protostellar cloud has approximately reached the stable condition of hydrostatic equilibrium, a protostar forms at the core.[31] These pre-main sequence stars are often surrounded by a protoplanetary disk. The period of gravitational contraction lasts for about 10 - 15 million years.

Early stars of less than 2 solar masses are called T Tauri stars, while those with greater mass are Herbig Ae/Be stars. These newly born stars emit jets of gas along their axis of rotation, producing small patches of nebulosity known as Herbig-Haro objects.[32]

Main sequence

See main article: Main sequence. Stars spend about 90% of their lifetime fusing hydrogen to produce helium in high-temperature and high-pressure reactions near the core. Such stars are said to be on the main sequence and are called dwarf stars. Starting at zero-age main sequence, the proportion of helium in a star's core will steadily increase. As a consequence, in order to maintain the required rate of nuclear fusion at the core, the star will slowly increase in temperature and luminosity.[33] The Sun, for example, is estimated to have increased in luminosity by about 40% since it reached the main sequence 4.6 billion years ago.

Every star generates a stellar wind of particles that causes a continual outflow of gas into space. For most stars, the amount of mass lost is negligible. The Sun loses 10-14 solar masses every year,[34] or about 0.01% of its total mass over its entire lifespan. However very massive stars can lose 10-7 to 10-5 solar masses each year, significantly affecting their evolution.[35] Stars that begin with more than 50 solar masses can lose over half their total mass while they remain on the main sequence.[36]

The duration that a star spends on the main sequence depends primarily on the amount of fuel it has to fuse and the rate at which it fuses that fuel. In other words, its initial mass and its luminosity. For the Sun, this is estimated to be about 1010 years. Large stars consume their fuel very rapidly and are short-lived. Small stars (called red dwarfs) consume their fuel very slowly and last tens to hundreds of billions of years. At the end of their lives, they simply become dimmer and dimmer.[2] However, since the lifespan of such stars is greater than the current age of the universe (13.7 billion years), no such stars are expected to exist yet.

Besides mass, the portion of elements heavier than helium can play a significant role in the evolution of stars. In astronomy all elements heavier than helium are considered a "metal", and the chemical concentration of these elements is called the metallicity. The metallicity can influence the duration that a star will burn its fuel, control the formation of magnetic fields[37] and modify the strength of the stellar wind.[38] Older, population II stars have substantially less metallicity than the younger, population I stars due to the composition of the molecular clouds from which they formed. (Over time these clouds become increasingly enriched in heavier elements as older stars die and shed portions of their atmospheres.)

Post-main sequence

As stars of at least 0.4 solar masses[2] exhaust their supply of hydrogen at their core, their outer layers expand greatly and cool to form a red giant. For example, in about 5 billion years, when the Sun is a red giant, it will expand out to a maximum radius of roughly 1lk=onNaNlk=on, 250 times its present size. As a giant, the Sun will lose roughly 30% of its current mass.[39] [40]

In a red giant of up to 2.25 solar masses, hydrogen fusion proceeds in a shell-layer surrounding the core.[41] Eventually the core is compressed enough to start helium fusion, and the star now gradually shrinks in radius and increases its surface temperature. For larger stars, the core region transitions directly from fusing hydrogen to fusing helium.[42]

After the star has consumed the helium at the core, fusion continues in a shell around a hot core of carbon and oxygen. The star then follows an evolutionary path that parallels the original red giant phase, but at a higher surface temperature.

Massive stars

During their helium-burning phase, very high mass stars with more than nine solar masses expand to form red supergiants. Once this fuel is exhausted at the core, they can continue to fuse elements heavier than helium.

The core contracts until the temperature and pressure are sufficient to fuse carbon (see carbon burning process). This process continues, with the successive stages being fueled by neon (see neon burning process), oxygen (see oxygen burning process), and silicon (see silicon burning process). Near the end of the star's life, fusion can occur along a series of onion-layer shells within the star. Each shell fuses a different element, with the outermost shell fusing hydrogen; the next shell fusing helium, and so forth.[43]

The final stage is reached when the star begins producing iron. Since iron nuclei are more tightly bound than any heavier nuclei, if they are fused they do not release energy—the process would, on the contrary, consume energy. Likewise, since they are more tightly bound than all lighter nuclei, energy cannot be released by fission.[41] In relatively old, very massive stars, a large core of inert iron will accumulate in the center of the star. The heavier elements in these stars can work their way up to the surface, forming evolved objects known as Wolf-Rayet stars that have a dense stellar wind which sheds the outer atmosphere.


An evolved, average-size star will now shed its outer layers as a planetary nebula. If what remains after the outer atmosphere has been shed is less than 1.4 solar masses, it shrinks to a relatively tiny object (about the size of Earth) that is not massive enough for further compression to take place, known as a white dwarf.[44] The electron-degenerate matter inside a white dwarf is no longer a plasma, even though stars are generally referred to as being spheres of plasma. White dwarfs will eventually fade into black dwarfs over a very long stretch of time.

In larger stars, fusion continues until the iron core has grown so large (more than 1.4 solar masses) that it can no longer support its own mass. This core will suddenly collapse as its electrons are driven into its protons, forming neutrons and neutrinos in a burst of inverse beta decay, or electron capture. The shockwave formed by this sudden collapse causes the rest of the star to explode in a supernova. Supernovae are so bright that they may briefly outshine the star's entire home galaxy. When they occur within the Milky Way, supernovae have historically been observed by naked-eye observers as "new stars" where none existed before.[45]

Most of the matter in the star is blown away by the supernovae explosion (forming nebulae such as the Crab Nebula[45]) and what remains will be a neutron star (which sometimes manifests itself as a pulsar or X-ray burster) or, in the case of the largest stars (large enough to leave a stellar remnant greater than roughly 4 solar masses), a black hole.[46] In a neutron star the matter is in a state known as neutron-degenerate matter, with a more exotic form of degenerate matter, QCD matter, possibly present in the core. Within a black hole the matter is in a state that is not currently understood.

The blown-off outer layers of dying stars include heavy elements which may be recycled during new star formation. These heavy elements allow the formation of rocky planets. The outflow from supernovae and the stellar wind of large stars play an important part in shaping the interstellar medium.[45]


In addition to isolated stars, a multi-star system can consist of two or more gravitationally bound stars that orbit around each other. The most common multi-star system is a binary star, but systems of three or more stars are also found. For reasons of orbital stability, such multi-star systems are often organized into hierarchical sets of co-orbiting binary stars.[47] Larger groups called star clusters also exist. These range from loose stellar associations with only a few stars, up to enormous globular clusters with hundreds of thousands of stars.

It has been a long-held assumption that the majority of stars occur in gravitationally bound, multiple-star systems. This is particularly true for very massive O and B class stars, where 80% of the systems are believed to be multiple. However the portion of single star systems increases for smaller stars, so that only 25% of red dwarfs are known to have stellar companions. As 85% of all stars are red dwarfs, most stars in the Milky Way are likely single from birth.[48]

Stars are not spread uniformly across the universe, but are normally grouped into galaxies along with interstellar gas and dust. A typical galaxy contains hundreds of billions of stars, and there are more than 100 billion (1011) galaxies in the observable universe.[49] While it is often believed that stars only exist within galaxies, intergalactic stars have been discovered.[50] Astronomers estimate that there are at least 70 sextillion (7×1022) stars in the observable universe.[51]

The nearest star to the Earth, apart from the Sun, is Proxima Centauri, which is 39.9 trillion (1012) kilometres, or 4.2 light-years away. Light from Proxima Centauri takes 4.2 years to reach Earth. Travelling at the orbital speed of the Space Shuttle (5 miles per second - almost 30,000 kilometres per hour), it would take about 150,000 years to get there.[52] Distances like this are typical inside galactic discs, including in the vicinity of the solar system.[53] Stars can be much closer to each other in the centres of galaxies and in globular clusters, or much farther apart in galactic halos.

Due to the relatively vast distances between stars outside the galactic nucleus, collisions between stars are thought to be rare. In denser regions such as the core of globular clusters or the galactic center, collisions can be more common.[54] Such collisions can produce what are known as blue stragglers. These abnormal stars have a higher surface temperature than the other main sequence stars with the same luminosity in the cluster .[55]


Almost everything about a star is determined by its initial mass, including essential characteristics such as luminosity and size, as well as the star's evolution, lifespan, and eventual fate.


Most stars are between 1 billion and 10 billion years old. Some stars may even be close to 13.7 billion years old - the observed age of the universe. The oldest star yet discovered, HE 1523-0901, is an estimated 13.2 billion years old.[56]

The more massive the star, the shorter its lifespan, primarily because massive stars have greater pressure on their cores, causing them to burn hydrogen more rapidly. The most massive stars last an average of about one million years, while stars of minimum mass (red dwarfs) burn their fuel very slowly and last tens to hundreds of billions of years.[57] [58]

Chemical composition

See also: Metallicity. When stars form they are composed of about 70% hydrogen and 28% helium, as measured by mass, with a small fraction of heavier elements. Typically the portion of heavy elements is measured in terms of the iron content of the stellar atmosphere, as iron is a common element and its absorption lines are relatively easy to measure. Because the molecular clouds where stars form are steadily enriched by heavier elements from supernovae explosions, a measurement of the chemical composition of a star can be used to infer its age.[59] The portion of heavier elements may also be an indicator of the likelihood that the star has a planetary system.[60]

The star with the lowest iron content ever measured is the dwarf HE1327-2326, with only 1/200,000th the iron content of the Sun.[61] By contrast, the super-metal-rich star μ Leonis has nearly double the abundance of iron as the Sun, while the planet-bearing star 14 Herculis has nearly triple the iron.[62] There also exist chemically peculiar stars that show unusual abundances of certain elements in their spectrum; especially chromium and rare earth elements.[63]


Due to their great distance from the Earth, all stars except the Sun appear to the human eye as shining points in the night sky that twinkle because of the effect of the Earth's atmosphere. The Sun is also a star, but it is close enough to the Earth to appear as a disk instead, and to provide daylight. Other than the Sun, the star with the largest apparent size is R Doradus, with an angular diameter of only 0.057 arcseconds.[64]

The disks of most stars are much too small in angular size to be observed with current ground-based optical telescopes, and so interferometer telescopes are required in order to produce images of these objects. Another technique for measuring the angular size of stars is through occultation. By precisely measuring the drop in brightness of a star as it is occulted by the Moon (or the rise in brightness when it reappears), the star's angular diameter can be computed.[65]

Stars range in size from neutron stars, which vary anywhere from 20 to 40 km in diameter, to supergiants like Betelgeuse in the Orion constellation, which has a diameter approximately 650 times larger than the Sun - about 0.9 billion kilometres. However, Betelgeuse has a much lower density than the Sun.[66]


See main article: Stellar kinematics. The motion of a star relative to the Sun can provide useful information about the origin and age of a star, as well as the structure and evolution of the surrounding galaxy. The components of motion of a star consist of the radial velocity toward or away from the Sun, and the traverse angular movement, which is called its proper motion.

Radial velocity is measured by the doppler shift of the star's spectral lines, and is given in units of km/s. The proper motion of a star is determined by precise astrometric measurements in units of milli-arc seconds (mas) per year. By determining the parallax of a star, the proper motion can then be converted into units of velocity. Stars with high rates of proper motion are likely to be relatively close to the Sun, making them good candidates for parallax measurements.[67]

Once both rates of movement are known, the space velocity of the star relative to the Sun or the galaxy can be computed. Among nearby stars, it has been found that population I stars have generally lower velocities than older, population II stars. The latter have elliptical orbits that are inclined to the plane of the galaxy.[68] Comparison of the kinematics of nearby stars has also led to the identification of stellar associations. These are most likely groups of stars that share a common point of origin in giant molecular clouds.[69]

Magnetic field

See main article: Stellar magnetic field.

The magnetic field of a star is generated within regions of the interior where convective circulation occurs. This movement of conductive plasma functions like a dynamo, generating magnetic fields that extend throughout the star. The strength of the magnetic field varies with the mass and composition of the star, and the amount of magnetic surface activity depends upon the star's rate of rotation. This surface activity produces starspots, which are regions of strong magnetic fields and lower than normal surface temperatures. Coronal loops are arching magnetic fields that reach out into the corona from active regions. Stellar flares are bursts of high-energy particles that are emitted due to the same magnetic activity.[70]

Young, rapidly rotating stars tend to have high levels of surface activity because of their magnetic field. The magnetic field can act upon a star's stellar wind, however, functioning as a brake to gradually slow the rate of rotation as the star grows older. Thus, older stars such as the Sun have a much slower rate of rotation and a lower level of surface activity. The activity levels of slowly rotating stars tend to vary in a cyclical manner and can shut down altogether for periods.[71] Duringthe Maunder minimum, for example, the Sun underwent a70-year period with almost no sunspot activity.


One of the most massive stars known is Eta Carinae,[72] with 100 - 150 times as much mass as the Sun; its lifespan is very short - only several million years at most. A recent study of the Arches cluster suggests that 150 solar masses is the upper limit for stars in the current era of the universe.[73] The reason for this limit is not precisely known, but it is partially due to the Eddington luminosity which defines the maximum amount of luminosity that can pass through the atmosphere of a star without ejecting the gases into space.

The first stars to form after the Big Bang may have been larger, up to 300 solar masses or more,[74] due to the complete absence of elements heavier than lithium in their composition. This generation of supermassive, population III stars is long extinct, however, and currently only theoretical.

With a mass only 93 times that of Jupiter, AB Doradus C, a companion to AB Doradus A, is the smallest known star undergoing nuclear fusion in its core.[75] For stars with similar metallicity to the Sun, the theoretical minimum mass the star can have, and still undergo fusion at the core, is estimated to be about 75 times the mass of Jupiter.[76] [77] When the metallicity is very low, however, a recent study of the faintest stars found that the minimum star size seems to be about 8.3% of the solar mass, or about 87 times the mass of Jupiter.[77] [78] Smaller bodies are called brown dwarfs, which occupy a poorly defined grey area between stars and gas giants.

The combination of the radius and the mass of a star determines the surface gravity. Giant stars have a much lower surface gravity than main sequence stars, while the opposite is the case for degenerate, compact stars such as white dwarfs. The surface gravity can influence the appearance of a star's spectrum, with higher gravity causing a broadening of the absorption lines.[17]


See main article: Stellar rotation.

The rotation rate of stars can be approximated through spectroscopic measurement, or more exactly determined by tracking the rotation rate of starspots. Young stars can have a rapid rate of rotation greater than 100 km/s at the equator. The B-class star Achernar, for example, has an equatorial rotation velocity of about 225 km/s or greater, giving it an equatorial diameter that is more than 50% larger than the distance between the poles. This rate of rotation is just below the critical velocity of 300 km/s where the star would break apart.[79] By contrast, the Sun only rotates once every 25  - 35 days, with an equatorial velocity of 1.994 km/s. The star's magnetic field and the stellar wind serve to slow down a main sequence star's rate of rotation by a significant amount as it evolves on the main sequence.[80]

Degenerate stars have contracted into a compact mass, resulting in a rapid rate of rotation. However they have relatively low rates of rotation compared to what would be expected by conservation of angular momentum - the tendency of a rotating body to compensate for a contraction in size by increasing its rate of spin. A large portion of the star's angular momentum is dissipated as a result of mass loss through the stellar wind.[81] In spite of this, the rate of rotation for a pulsar can be very rapid. The pulsar at the heart of the Crab nebula, for example, rotates 30 times per second.[82] The rotation rate of the pulsar will gradually slow due to the emission of radiation.


The surface temperature of a main sequence star is determined by the rate of energy production at the core and the radius of the star and is often estimated from the star's color index.[83] It is normally given as the effective temperature, which is the temperature of an idealized black body that radiates its energy at the same luminosity per surface area as the star. Note that the effective temperature is only a representative value, however, as stars actually have a temperature gradient that decreases with increasing distance from the core.[84] The temperature in the core region of a star is several million kelvins.

The stellar temperature will determine the rate of energization or ionization of different elements, resulting in characteristic absorption lines in the spectrum. The surface temperature of a star, along with its visual absolute magnitude and absorption features, is used to classify a star (see classification below).[17]

Massive main sequence stars can have surface temperatures of 50,000 K. Smaller stars such as the Sun have surface temperatures of a few thousand degrees. Red giants have relatively low surface temperatures of about 3,600 K, but they also have a high luminosity due to their large exterior surface area.[85]


The energy produced by stars, as a by-product of nuclear fusion, radiates into space as both electromagnetic radiation and particle radiation. The particle radiation emitted by a star is manifested as the stellar wind[86] (which exists as a steady stream of electrically charged particles, such as free protons, alpha particles, and beta particles, emanating from the star’s outer layers) and as a steady stream of neutrinos emanating from the star’s core.

The production of energy at the core is the reason why stars shine so brightly: every time two or more atomic nuclei of one element fuse together to form an atomic nucleus of a new heavier element, gamma ray photons are released from the nuclear fusion reaction. This energy is converted to other forms of electromagnetic energy, including visible light, by the time it reaches the star’s outer layers.

The color of a star, as determined by the peak frequency of the visible light, depends on the temperature of the star’s outer layers, including its photosphere.[87] Besides visible light, stars also emit forms of electromagnetic radiation that are invisible to the human eye. In fact, stellar electromagnetic radiation spans the entire electromagnetic spectrum, from the longest wavelengths of radio waves and infrared to the shortest wavelengths of ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays. All components of stellar electromagnetic radiation, both visible and invisible, are typically significant.

Using the stellar spectrum, astronomers can also determine the surface temperature, surface gravity, metallicity and rotational velocity of a star. If the distance of the star is known, such as by measuring the parallax, then the luminosity of the star can be derived. The mass, radius, surface gravity, and rotation period can then be estimated based on stellar models. (Mass can be measured directly for stars in binary systems. The technique of gravitational microlensing will also yield the mass of a star.[88]) With these parameters, astronomers can also estimate the age of the star.[89]


In astronomy, luminosity is the amount of light, and other forms of radiant energy, a star radiates per unit of time. The luminosity of a star is determined by the radius and the surface temperature. However, many stars do not radiate a uniform flux - the amount of energy radiated per unit area - across their entire surface. The rapidly rotating star Vega, for example, has a higher energy flux at its poles than along its equator.[90]

Surface patches with a lower temperature and luminosity than average are known as starspots. Small, dwarf stars such as the Sun generally have essentially featureless disks with only small starspots. Larger, giant stars have much bigger, much more obvious starspots,[91] and they also exhibit strong stellar limb darkening. That is, the brightness decreases towards the edge of the stellar disk.[92] Red dwarf flare stars such as UV Ceti may also possess prominent starspot features.[93]


See main article: Apparent magnitude and Absolute magnitude.

The apparent brightness of a star is measured by its apparent magnitude, which is the brightness of a star with respect to the star’s luminosity, distance from Earth, and the altering of the star’s light as it passes through Earth’s atmosphere. Intrinsic or absolute magnitude is what the apparent magnitude a star would be if the distance between the Earth and the star were 10 parsecs (32.6 light-years), and it is directly related to a star’s luminosity.

Number of stars brighter than magnitude!Apparent
of Stars[94]

Both the apparent and absolute magnitude scales are logarithmic units: one whole number difference in magnitude is equal to a brightness variation of about 2.5 times[95] (the 5th root of 100 or approximately 2.512). This means that a first magnitude (+1.00) star is about 2.5 times brighter than a second magnitude (+2.00) star, and approximately 100 times brighter than a sixth magnitude (+6.00) star. The faintest stars visible to the naked eye under good seeing conditions are about magnitude +6.

On both apparent and absolute magnitude scales, the smaller the magnitude number, the brighter the star; the larger the magnitude number, the fainter. The brightest stars, on either scale, have negative magnitude numbers. The variation in brightness (ΔL) between two stars is calculated by subtracting the magnitude number of the brighter star (mb) from the magnitude number of the fainter star (mf), then using the difference as an exponent for the base number 2.512; that is to say:



} = \Delta

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Bahcall. John N.. 2000-06-29. How the Sun Shines. Nobel Foundation. 2006-08-30.
  2. Web site: Richmond. Michael. Late stages of evolution for low-mass stars. Rochester Institute of Technology. 2006-08-04.
  3. Web site: Stellar Evolution & Death. NASA Observatorium. 2006-06-08.
  4. Iben. Icko, Jr.. Single and binary star evolution. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 1991. 76. 55–114. 10.1086/191565.
  5. Book: Forbes, George. History of Astronomy. Watts & Co.. London. 1909. Free e-book from Project Gutenberg.
  6. Web site: Tøndering. Claus. Other ancient calendars. WebExhibits. 2006-12-10.
  7. von Spaeth. Ove. Dating the Oldest Egyptian Star Map. Centaurus International Magazine of the History of Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2000. 42. 3. 159–179. 2007-10-21.
  8. Web site: Zahoor. A.. 1997. Al-Biruni. Hasanuddin University. 2007-10-21.
  9. Clark, D. H.; Stephenson, F. R.. The Historical Supernovae. Supernovae: A survey of current research; Proceedings of the Advanced Study Institute. 355 - 370. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1981-06-29. Cambridge, England. 2006-09-24.
  10. Web site: Drake. Stephen A.. 2006-08-17. A Brief History of High-Energy (X-ray & Gamma-Ray) Astronomy. NASA HEASARC. 2006-08-24.
  11. Web site: 2006-07-24. Exoplanets. ESO. 2006-10-11.
  12. Web site: Hoskin. Michael. 1998. The Value of Archives in Writing the History of Astronomy. Space Telescope Science Institute. 2006-08-24.
  13. Proctor. Richard A.. Are any of the nebulæ star-systems?. Nature. 1870. 331–333. 10.1038/001331a0. 1.
  14. Web site: MacDonnell. Joseph. Angelo Secchi, S.J. (1818–1878) the Father of Astrophysics. Fairfield University. 2006-10-02.
  15. Book: Aitken, Robert G.. The Binary Stars. Dover Publications Inc.. New York. 1964.
  16. Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G.. Measurement of the diameter of Alpha Orionis with the interferometer. Astrophysical Journal. 1921. 53. 249–259. 10.1086/142603 .
  17. Book: Unsöld, Albrecht. The New Cosmos. Springer-Verlag. New York. 1969.
  18. e. g. Battinelli, Paolo; Demers, Serge; Letarte, Bruno. Carbon Star Survey in the Local Group. V. The Outer Disk of M31. The Astronomical Journal. 2003. 125. 3. 1298–1308. 2007-02-04. 10.1086/346274 .
  19. News: Millennium Star Atlas marks the completion of ESA's Hipparcos Mission. ESA. 1997-12-08. 2007-08-05.
  20. Web site: Villard, Ray; Freedman, Wendy L.. 1994-10-26. Hubble Space Telescope Measures Precise Distance to the Most Remote Galaxy Yet. Hubble Site. 2007-08-05.
  21. News: Hubble Completes Eight-Year Effort to Measure Expanding Universe. Hubble Site. 1999-05-25. 2007-08-02.
  22. News: UBC Prof., alumnus discover most distant star clusters: a billion light-years away.. UBC Public Affairs. 2007-01-08. 2007-08-02.
  23. Web site: Coleman. Leslie S. Myths, Legends and Lore. Frosty Drew Observatory. 2006-08-13.
  24. Web site: Naming Astronomical Objects. International Astronomical Union (IAU). 2009-01-30.
  25. Web site: Naming Stars. Students for the Exploration and Development of Space (SEDS). 2009-01-30.
  26. Web site: The Naming of Stars. National Maritime Museum. 2006-08-13.
  27. Web site: Adams. Cecil. 1998-04-01. Can you pay $35 to get a star named after you?. The Straight Dope. 2006-08-13.
  28. Sackmann, I.-J.; Boothroyd, A. I.. Our Sun. V. A Bright Young Sun Consistent with Helioseismology and Warm Temperatures on Ancient Earth and Mars. The Astrophysical Journal. 2003. 583. 2. 1024–1039. 10.1086/345408.
  29. Tripathy, S. C.; Antia, H. M.. Influence of surface layers on the seismic estimate of the solar radius. Solar Physics. 1999. 186. 1/2. 1–11. 10.1023/A:1005116830445 .
  30. Woodward. P. R.. Theoretical models of star formation. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics. 1978. 16. 555–584. 10.1146/annurev.aa.16.090178.003011 .
  31. Web site: Seligman. Courtney. Slow Contraction of Protostellar Cloud. Self-published. 2006-09-05.
  32. Bally, J.; Morse, J.; Reipurth, B.. 1996. The Birth of Stars: Herbig-Haro Jets, Accretion and Proto-Planetary Disks. Science with the Hubble Space Telescope - II. Proceedings of a workshop held in Paris, France, December 4–8, 1995. Piero Benvenuti, F.D. Macchetto, and Ethan J. Schreier. Space Telescope Science Institute. 491. 2006-07-14.
  33. Mengel, J. G.; Demarque, P.; Sweigart, A. V.; Gross, P. G.. Stellar evolution from the zero-age main sequence. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 1979. 40. 733–791. 10.1086/190603 .
  34. Wood, B. E.; Müller, H.-R.; Zank, G. P.; Linsky, J. L.. Measured Mass-Loss Rates of Solar-like Stars as a Function of Age and Activity. The Astrophysical Journal. 2002. 574. 1. 412–425. 10.1086/340797 .
  35. de Loore. C.. de Greve, J. P.; Lamers, H. J. G. L. M.. Evolution of massive stars with mass loss by stellar wind. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1977. 61. 2. 251–259.
  36. Web site: The evolution of stars between 50 and 100 times the mass of the Sun. Royal Greenwich Observatory. 2006-09-07.
  37. Pizzolato, N.; Ventura, P.; D'Antona, F.; Maggio, A.; Micela, G.; Sciortino, S.. Subphotospheric convection and magnetic activity dependence on metallicity and age: Models and tests. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2001. 373. 597–607. 10.1051/0004-6361:20010626.
  38. Web site: 2004-06-18. Mass loss and Evolution. UCL Astrophysics Group. 2006-08-26.
  39. Sackmann, I. J.; Boothroyd, A. I.; Kraemer, K. E.. Our Sun. III. Present and Future. 457. Astrophysical Journal. 1993. 418. 10.1086/173407 .
  40. K.-P.. Schröder. Smith, Robert Connon. 2008. Distant future of the Sun and Earth revisited. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13022.x. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 386. 155. See also News: Hope dims that Earth will survive Sun's death. 2008-02-22. news service. Jason. Palmer. 2008-03-24.
  41. Web site: Hinshaw. Gary. 2006-08-23. The Life and Death of Stars. NASA WMAP Mission. 2006-09-01.
  42. Iben. Icko, Jr.. Single and binary star evolution. Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 1991. 76. 55–114. 2007-03-03. 10.1086/191565.
  43. Web site: What is a star?. Royal Greenwich Observatory. 2006-09-07.
  44. Liebert, J.. White dwarf stars. Annual review of astronomy and astrophysics. 1980. 18. 2. 363–398. 10.1146/annurev.aa.18.090180.002051 .
  45. Web site: 2006-04-06. Introduction to Supernova Remnants. Goddard Space Flight Center. 2006-07-16.
  46. Fryer, C. L.. Black-hole formation from stellar collapse. Classical and Quantum Gravity. 2003. 20. S73–S80. 10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/309 .
  47. Book: Szebehely, Victor G.. Curran, Richard B.. 1985. Stability of the Solar System and Its Minor Natural and Artificial Bodies. Springer. 9027720460.
  48. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. 2006-01-30. Most Milky Way Stars Are Single. 2006-07-16.
  49. Web site: What is a galaxy? How many stars in a galaxy / the Universe?. Royal Greenwich Observatory. 2006-07-18.
  50. News: Hubble Finds Intergalactic Stars. Hubble News Desk. 1997-01-14. 2006-11-06.
  51. News: Astronomers count the stars. BBC News. 2003-07-22. 2006-07-18.
  52. 3.99 × 1013 km / (3 × 104 km/h × 24 × 365.25) = 1.5 × 105 years.
  53. Holmberg, J.; Flynn, C.. The local density of matter mapped by Hipparcos. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 313. 2. 2000. 209–216. 2006-07-18. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.02905.x .
  54. News: Astronomers: Star collisions are rampant, catastrophic. CNN News. 2000-06-02. 2006-07-21.
  55. J. C.. Lombardi, Jr.. Warren, J. S.; Rasio, F. A.; Sills, A.; Warren, A. R.. Stellar Collisions and the Interior Structure of Blue Stragglers. The Astrophysical Journal. 2002. 568. 939–953. 10.1086/339060 .
  56. News: Frebel, A.; Norris, J. E.; Christlieb, N.; Thom, C.; Beers, T. C.; Rhee, J. Nearby Star Is A Galactic Fossil. Science Daily. 2007-05-11. 2007-05-10.
  57. Web site: Naftilan, S. A.; Stetson, P. B.. 2006-07-13. How do scientists determine the ages of stars? Is the technique really accurate enough to use it to verify the age of the universe?. Scientific American. 2007-05-11.
  58. Laughlin, G.; Bodenheimer, P.; Adams, F. C.. The End of the Main Sequence. The Astrophysical Journal. 1997. 482. 420–432. 2007-05-11. 10.1086/304125 .
  59. Web site: 2006-09-12. A "Genetic Study" of the Galaxy. ESO. 2006-10-10.
  60. Fischer, D. A.; Valenti, J.. The Planet-Metallicity Correlation. The Astrophysical Journal. 2005. 622. 2. 1102–1117. 10.1086/428383 .
  61. Web site: 2005-04-17. Signatures Of The First Stars. ScienceDaily. 2006-10-10.
  62. Feltzing. S.. Gonzalez, G.. The nature of super-metal-rich stars: Detailed abundance analysis of 8 super-metal-rich star candidates. Astronomy & Astrophysics. 2000. 367. 253–265. 2007-11-27. 10.1051/0004-6361:20000477.
  63. Book: Gray, David F.. 1992. The Observation and Analysis of Stellar Photospheres. Cambridge University Press. 0521408687.
  64. News: The Biggest Star in the Sky. ESO. 1997-03-11. 2006-07-10.
  65. Ragland, S.; Chandrasekhar, T.; Ashok, N. M.. Angular Diameter of Carbon Star Tx-Piscium from Lunar Occultation Observations in the Near Infrared. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy. 1995. 16. 332. 2007-07-05.
  66. Web site: Davis. Kate. 2000-12-01. Variable Star of the Month - December, 2000: Alpha Orionis. AAVSO. 2006-08-13.
  67. Web site: 1999-09-10. Hipparcos: High Proper Motion Stars. ESA. 2006-10-10.
  68. Johnson. Hugh M.. The Kinematics and Evolution of Population I Stars. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific. 1957. 69. 406. 54. 10.1086/127012.
  69. Elmegreen, B.; Efremov, Y. N.. The Formation of Star Clusters. American Scientist. 1999. 86. 3. 264. 2006-08-23. 10.1511/1998.3.264.
  70. Web site: Brainerd. Jerome James. 2005-07-06. X-rays from Stellar Coronas. The Astrophysics Spectator. 2007-06-21.
  71. Web site: Berdyugina. Svetlana V.. 2005. Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo. Living Reviews. 2007-06-21.
  72. Nathan. Smith. 1998. The Behemoth Eta Carinae: A Repeat Offender. Astronomical Society of the Pacific. Mercury Magazine. 27. 20. 2006-08-13.
  73. News: NASA's Hubble Weighs in on the Heaviest Stars in the Galaxy. NASA News. 2005-03-03. 2006-08-04.
  74. News: Ferreting Out The First Stars. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. 2005-09-22. 2006-09-05.
  75. News: Weighing the Smallest Stars. ESO. 2005-01-01. 2006-08-13.
  76. Web site: Alan. Boss. 2001-04-03. Are They Planets or What?. Carnegie Institution of Washington. 2006-06-08.
  77. Web site: Shiga. David. 2006-08-17. Mass cut-off between stars and brown dwarfs revealed. New Scientist. 2006-08-23.
  78. News: Hubble glimpses faintest stars. BBC. 2006-08-18. 2006-08-22.
  79. News: Flattest Star Ever Seen. ESO. 2003-06-11. 2006-10-03.
  80. Web site: Fitzpatrick. Richard. 2006-02-13. Introduction to Plasma Physics: A graduate course. The University of Texas at Austin. 2006-10-04.
  81. Villata. Massimo. Angular momentum loss by a stellar wind and rotational velocities of white dwarfs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 1992. 257. 3. 450–454.
  82. News: A History of the Crab Nebula. ESO. 1996-05-30. 2006-10-03.
  83. Web site: Properties of Stars: Color and Temperature. 2007-10-09. Strobel. Nick. 2007-08-20. Astronomy Notes. Primis/McGraw-Hill, Inc.. 2007-06-26.
  84. Web site: Courtney. Seligman. Self-published. Review of Heat Flow Inside Stars. 2007-07-05.
  85. Book: Zeilik, Michael A.. Gregory, Stephan A.. Introductory Astronomy & Astrophysics. 4th ed.. 1998. Saunders College Publishing. 0030062284. 321.
  86. News: Roach. John. Astrophysicist Recognized for Discovery of Solar Wind. National Geographic News. 2003-08-27. 2006-06-13.
  87. Web site: The Colour of Stars. Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. 2006-08-13.
  88. News: Astronomers Measure Mass of a Single Star—First Since the Sun. Hubble News Desk. 2004-07-15. 2006-05-24.
  89. Garnett, D. R.; Kobulnicky, H. A.. Distance Dependence in the Solar Neighborhood Age-Metallicity Relation. The Astrophysical Journal. 2000. 532. 1192–1196. 10.1086/308617.
  90. News: Staff. 2006-01-10. Rapidly Spinning Star Vega has Cool Dark Equator. National Optical Astronomy Observatory. 2007-11-18.
  91. Michelson, A. A.; Pease, F. G.. Starspots: A Key to the Stellar Dynamo. Living Reviews in Solar Physics. Max Planck Society. 2005.
  92. Manduca, A.; Bell, R. A.; Gustafsson, B.. Limb darkening coefficients for late-type giant model atmospheres. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 1977. 61. 6. 809–813.
  93. Chugainov, P. F.. On the Cause of Periodic Light Variations of Some Red Dwarf Stars. Information Bulletin on Variable Stars. 1971. 520. 1–3.
  94. Web site: Magnitude. National Solar Observatory - Sacramento Peak. 2006-08-23.
  95. Web site: Luminosity of Stars. Australian Telescope Outreach and Education. 2006-08-13.