In electronics, impedance matching is the practice of designing the input impedance of an electrical load (or the output impedance of its corresponding signal source) to maximize the power transfer or minimize reflections from the load.
In the case of a complex source impedance Z_{S} and load impedance Z_{L}, maximum power transfer is obtained when
Z_{S=}
*  
Z  
L 
where * indicates the complex conjugate.Minimum reflection is obtained when
Z_{S=}Z_{L}
The concept of impedance matching was originally developed for electrical engineering, but can be applied to any other field where a form of energy (not necessarily electrical) is transferred between a source and a load. An alternative to impedance matching is impedance bridging, where the load impedance is chosen to be much larger than the source impedance and maximizing voltage transfer (rather than power) is the goal.
Impedance is the opposition by a system to the flow of energy from a source. For constant signals, this impedance can also be constant. For varying signals, it usually changes with frequency. The energy involved can be electrical, mechanical, magnetic or thermal. The concept of electrical impedance is perhaps the most commonly known. Electrical impedance, like electrical resistance, is measured in ohms. In general, impedance has a complex value; this means that loads generally have a resistance component (symbol: R) which forms the real part of Z and a reactance component (symbol: X) which forms the imaginary part of Z.
In simple cases (such as lowfrequency or directcurrent power transmission) the reactance may be negligible or zero; the impedance can be considered a pure resistance, expressed as a real number. In the following summary we will consider the general case when resistance and reactance are both significant, and the special case in which the reactance is negligible.
Impedance matching to minimize reflections is achieved by making the load impedance equal to the source impedance. Ideally, the source and load impedances should be purely resistive: in this special case reflectionless matching is the same as maximum power transfer matching. A transmission line connecting the source and load together must also be the same impedance: Z_{load} = Z_{line} = Z_{source}, where Z_{line} is the characteristic impedance of the transmission line. The transmission line characteristic impedance should also ideally be purely resistive. Cable makers try to get as close to this ideal as possible and transmission lines are often assumed to have a purely real characteristic impedance in calculations, however, it is conventional to still use the term characteristic impedance rather than characteristic resistance.
Complex conjugate matching is used when maximum power transfer is required. This is different from reflectionless matching only when the source or load have a reactive component.
Z_{load} = Z_{source}^{*}
(where * indicates the complex conjugate).
If the source has a reactive component, but the load is purely resistive then matching can be achieved by adding a reactance of the opposite sign to the load. This simple matching network consisting of a single element will usually only achieve a perfect match at a single frequency. This is because the added element will either be a capacitor or an inductor, both of which are frequency dependent and will not, in general, follow the frequency dependence of the source impedance. For wide bandwidth applications a more complex network needs to be designed.
See main article: Maximum power theorem.
Whenever a source of power with a fixed output impedance such as an electric signal source, a radio transmitter or a mechanical sound (e.g., a loudspeaker) operates into a load, the maximum possible power is delivered to the load when the impedance of the load (load impedance or input impedance) is equal to the complex conjugate of the impedance of the source (that is, its internal impedance or output impedance). For two impedances to be complex conjugates their resistances must be equal, and their reactances must be equal in magnitude but of opposite signs. In lowfrequency or DC systems (or systems with purely resistive sources and loads) the reactances are zero, or small enough to be ignored. In this case, maximum power transfer occurs when the resistance of the load is equal to the resistance of the source (see maximum power theorem for a mathematical proof).
Impedance matching is not always necessary. For example, if a source with a low impedance is connected to a load with a high impedance the power that can pass through the connection is limited by the higher impedance. This maximumvoltage connection is a common configuration called impedance bridging or voltage bridging, and is widely used in signal processing. In such applications, delivering a high voltage (to minimize signal degradation during transmission or to consume less power by reducing currents) is often more important than maximum power transfer.
In older audio systems (reliant on transformers and passive filter networks, and based on the telephone system), the source and load resistances were matched at 600 ohms. One reason for this was to maximize power transfer, as there were no amplifiers available that could restore lost signal. Another reason was to ensure correct operation of the hybrid transformers used at central exchange equipment to separate outgoing from incoming speech, so these could be amplified or fed to a fourwire circuit. Most modern audio circuits, on the other hand, use active amplification and filtering and can use voltagebridging connections for greatest accuracy. Strictly speaking, impedance matching only applies when both source and load devices are linear; however, matching may be obtained between nonlinear devices within certain operating ranges.
Adjusting the source impedance or the load impedance, in general, is called "impedance matching". There are three ways to improve an impedance mismatch, all of which are called "impedance matching":
There are a variety of devices used between a source of energy and a load that perform "impedance matching". To match electrical impedances, engineers use combinations of transformers, resistors, inductors, capacitors and transmission lines. These passive (and active) impedancematching devices are optimized for different applications and include baluns, antenna tuners (sometimes called ATUs or rollercoasters, because of their appearance), acoustic horns, matching networks, and terminators.
Transformers are sometimes used to match the impedances of circuits. A transformer converts alternating current at one voltage to the same waveform at another voltage. The power input to the transformer and output from the transformer is the same (except for conversion losses). The side with the lower voltage is at low impedance (because this has the lower number of turns), and the side with the higher voltage is at a higher impedance (as it has more turns in its coil).
One example of this method involves a television balun transformer. This transformer converts a balanced signal from the antenna (via 300ohm twinlead) into an unbalanced signal (75ohm coaxial cable such as RG6). To match the impedances of both devices, both cables must be connected to a matching transformer with a turns ratio of 2 (such as a 2:1 transformer). In this example, the 75ohm cable is connected to the transformer side with fewer turns; the 300ohm line is connected to the transformer side with more turns. The formula for calculating the transformer turns ratio for this example is Turns Ratio = √ [(Load Resistance)/(Source Resistance)].
Resistive impedance matches are easiest to design and can be achieved with a simple L pad consisting of two resistors. Power loss is an unavoidable consequence of using resistive networks, and they are only (usually) used to transfer line level signals.
Most lumpedelement devices can match a specific range of load impedances. For example, in order to match an inductive load into a real impedance, a capacitor needs to be used. If the load impedance becomes capacitive, the matching element must be replaced by an inductor. In many cases, there is a need to use the same circuit to match a broad range of load impedance and thus simplify the circuit design. This issue was addressed by the stepped transmission line,^{[1]} where multiple, serially placed, quarterwave dielectric slugs are used to vary a transmission line's characteristic impedance. By controlling the position of each element, a broad range of load impedances can be matched without having to reconnect the circuit.
Filters are frequently used to achieve impedance matching in telecommunications and radio engineering. In general, it is not theoretically possible to achieve perfect impedance matching at all frequencies with a network of discrete components. Impedance matching networks are designed with a definite bandwidth, take the form of a filter, and use filter theory in their design.
Applications requiring only a narrow bandwidth, such as radio tuners and transmitters, might use a simple tuned filter such as a stub. This would provide a perfect match at one specific frequency only. Wide bandwidth matching requires filters with multiple sections.
A simple electrical impedancematching network requires one capacitor and one inductor. One reactance is in parallel with the source (or load), and the other is in series with the load (or source). If a reactance is in parallel with the source, the effective network matches from high to low impedance. The Lsection is inherently a narrowband matching network.
The analysis is as follows. Consider a real source impedance of
R_{1}
R_{2}
X_{1}
jR_{1}X_{1}  
R_{1}+jX_{1} 
If the imaginary part of the above impedance is canceled by the series reactance, the real part is
R_{2}=
 

Solving for
X_{1}
X_{1}=\sqrt{
 
R_{1}R_{2} 
If
R_{1}\ggR_{2}
X_{1} ≈ \sqrt{R_{1}R_{2}}
The inverse connection (impedance stepup) is simply the reverse—for example, reactance in series with the source. The magnitude of the impedance ratio is limited by reactance losses such as the Q of the inductor. Multiple Lsections can be wired in cascade to achieve higher impedance ratios or greater bandwidth. Transmission line matching networks can be modeled as infinitely many Lsections wired in cascade. Optimal matching circuits can be designed for a particular system using Smith charts.
Power factor correction devices are intended to cancel the reactive and nonlinear characteristics of a load at the end of a power line. This causes the load seen by the power line to be purely resistive. For a given true power required by a load this minimizes the true current supplied through the power lines, and minimizes power wasted in the resistance of those power lines. For example, a maximum power point tracker is used to extract the maximum power from a solar panel and efficiently transfer it to batteries, the power grid or other loads.The maximum power theorem applies to its "upstream" connection to the solar panel, so it emulates a load resistance equal to the solar panel source resistance. However, the maximum power theorem does not apply to its "downstream" connection. That connection is an impedance bridging connection; it emulates a highvoltage, lowresistance source to maximize efficiency.
On the power grid the overall load is usually inductive. Consequently, power factor correction is most commonly achieved with banks of capacitors. It is only necessary for correction to be achieved at one single frequency, the frequency of the supply. Complex networks are only required when a band of frequencies must be matched and this is the reason why simple capacitors are all that is usually required for power factor correction.
Impedance bridging is unsuitable for RF connections, because it causes power to be reflected back to the source from the boundary between the high and the low impedances. The reflection creates a standing wave if there is reflection at both ends of the transmission line, which leads to further power waste and may cause frequencydependent loss. In these systems, impedance matching is desirable.
In electrical systems involving transmission lines (such as radio and fiber optics)—where the length of the line is long compared to the wavelength of the signal (the signal changes rapidly compared to the time it takes to travel from source to load)— the impedances at each end of the line must be matched to the transmission line's characteristic impedance (
Z_{c}
The general form of the voltage reflection coefficient for a wave moving from medium 1 to medium 2 is given by
\Gamma_{12}={Z_{2}Z_{1}\overZ_{2}+Z_{1} }
while the voltage reflection coefficient for a wave moving from medium 2 to medium 1 is
\Gamma_{21}={Z_{1}Z_{2}\overZ_{1}+Z_{2} }
\Gamma_{21}=\Gamma_{12}
so the reflection coefficient is the same (except for sign), no matter from which direction the wave approaches the boundary.
There is also a current reflection coefficient; it is the same as the voltage coefficient, except that it has an opposite sign. If the wave encounters an open at the load end, positive voltage and negative current pulses are transmitted back toward the source (negative current means the current is going the opposite direction). Thus, at each boundary there are four reflection coefficients (voltage and current on one side, and voltage and current on the other side). All four are the same, except that two are positive and two are negative. The voltage reflection coefficient and current reflection coefficient on the same side have opposite signs. Voltage reflection coefficients on opposite sides of the boundary have opposite signs.
Because they are all the same except for sign it is traditional to interpret the reflection coefficient as the voltage reflection coefficient (unless otherwise indicated). Either end (or both ends) of a transmission line can be a source or a load (or both), so there is no inherent preference for which side of the boundary is medium 1 and which side is medium 2. With a single transmission line it is customary to define the voltage reflection coefficient for a wave incident on the boundary from the transmission line side, regardless of whether a source or load is connected on the other side.
In a transmission line, a wave travels from the source along the line. Suppose the wave hits a boundary (an abrupt change in impedance). Some of the wave is reflected back, while some keeps moving onwards. (Assume there is only one boundary, at the load.)
Let:
V_{i}
I_{i}
V_{t}
I_{t}
V_{r}
I_{r}
On the line side of the boundary
V_{i}=Z_{c}I_{i}
V_{r}=Z_{c}I_{r}
V_{t}=Z_{L}I_{t}
V_{i}
V_{r}
V_{t}
I_{i}
I_{r}
I_{t}
Z_{c}
At a boundary, voltage and current must be continuous, therefore
V_{t}=V_{i}+V_{r}
I_{t}=I_{i}+I_{r}
All these conditions are satisfied by
V_{r}=\Gamma_{TL}V_{i}
I_{r}=\Gamma_{TL}I_{i}
V_{t}=(1+\Gamma_{TL})V_{i}
I_{t}=(1\Gamma_{TL})I_{i}
where :
\Gamma_{TL}
\Gamma_{TL}={Z_{L}Z_{c}\overZ_{L}+Z_{c}}=\Gamma_{L}
The purpose of a transmission line is to get the maximum amount of energy to the other end of the line (or to transmit information with minimal error), so the reflection is as small as possible. This is achieved by matching the impedances
Z_{L}
Z_{c}
\Gamma=0
At the source end of the transmission line, there may be waves incident both from the source and from the line; a reflection coefficient for each direction may be computed with
\Gamma_{ST}=\Gamma_{TS}={Z_{s}Z_{c}\overZ_{s}+Z_{c}}=\Gamma_{S}
Z_{in}=Z_{C}
(1+T^{2}\Gamma_{L})  
(1T^{2}\Gamma_{L}) 
where
T ,
T
\Gamma_{L}=0
Z_{in}=Z_{C}
V_{L}=V_{S}
T(1\Gamma_{S)(1}+\Gamma_{L)}  
2(1T^{2}\Gamma_{S}\Gamma_{L)} 
where
V_{S}
Note that if there is a perfect match at both ends
\Gamma_{L}=0
\Gamma_{S}=0
V_{L}=V_{S}
T  
2 
Telephone systems also use matched impedances to minimise echo on longdistance lines. This is related to transmissionline theory. Matching also enables the telephone hybrid coil (2 to 4wire conversion) to operate correctly. As the signals are sent and received on the same twowire circuit to the central office (or exchange), cancellation is necessary at the telephone earpiece so excessive sidetone is not heard. All devices used in telephone signal paths are generally dependent on matched cable, source and load impedances. In the local loop, the impedance chosen is 600 ohms (nominal). Terminating networks are installed at the exchange to offer the best match to their subscriber lines. Each country has its own standard for these networks, but they are all designed to approximate about 600 ohms over the voice frequency band.
Audio amplifiers typically do not match impedances, but provide an output impedance that is lower than the load impedance (such as < 0.1 ohm in typical semiconductor amplifiers), for improved speaker damping. For vacuum tube amplifiers, impedancechanging transformers are often used to get a low output impedance, and to better match the amplifier's performance to the load impedance. Some tube amplifiers have output transformer taps to adapt the amplifier output to typical loudspeaker impedances.
The output transformer in vacuumtubebased amplifiers has two basic functions:
The impedance of the loudspeaker on the secondary coil of the transformer will be transformed to a higher impedance on the primary coil in the circuit of the power pentodes by the square of the turns ratio, which forms the impedance scaling factor.
The output stage in commondrain or commoncollector semiconductorbased end stages with MOSFETs or power transistors has a very low output impedance. If they are properly balanced, there is no need for a transformer or a large electrolytic capacitor to separate AC from DC current.
Similar to electrical transmission lines, an impedance matching problem exists when transferring sound energy from one medium to another. If the acoustic impedance of the two media are very different most sound energy will be reflected (or absorbed), rather than transferred across the border. The gel used in medical ultrasonography helps transfer acoustic energy from the transducer to the body and back again. Without the gel, the impedance mismatch in the transducertoair and the airtobody discontinuity reflects almost all the energy, leaving very little to go into the body.
Horns are used like transformers, matching the impedance of the transducer to the impedance of the air. This principle is used in both horn loudspeakers and musical instruments. Most loudspeaker systems contain impedance matching mechanisms, especially for low frequencies. Because most driver impedances which are poorly matched to the impedance of free air at low frequencies (and because of outofphase cancellations between output from the front and rear of a speaker cone), loudspeaker enclosures both match impedances and prevent interference. Sound, coupling with air, from a loudspeaker is related to the ratio of the diameter of the speaker to the wavelength of the sound being reproduced. That is, larger speakers can produce lower frequencies at a higher level than smaller speakers for this reason. Elliptical speakers are a complex case, acting like large speakers lengthwise and small speakers crosswise. Acoustic impedance matching (or the lack of it) affects the operation of a megaphone, an echo and soundproofing.
A similar effect occurs when light (or any electromagnetic wave) hits the interface between two media with different refractive indices. For nonmagnetic materials, the refractive index is inversely proportional to the material's characteristic impedance. An optical or wave impedance (that depends on the propagation direction) can be calculated for each medium, and may be used in the transmissionline reflection equation
r={Z_{2}Z_{1}\overZ_{1}+Z_{2} }
to calculate reflection and transmission coefficients for the interface. For nonmagnetic dielectrics, this equation is equivalent to the Fresnel equations. Unwanted reflections can be reduced by the use of an antireflection optical coating.
If a body of mass m collides elastically with a second body, maximum energy transfer to the second body will occur when the second body has the same mass m. In a headon collision of equal masses, the energy of the first body will be completely transferred to the second body. In this case, the masses act as "mechanical impedances", which must be matched. If
m_{1}
m_{2}
E  

which is analogous to the powertransfer equation in the above mathematicalproof section.
These principles are useful in the application of highly energetic materials (explosives). If an explosive charge is placed on a target, the sudden release of energy causes compression waves to propagate through the target radially from the pointcharge contact. When the compression waves reach areas of high acoustic impedance mismatch (such as the opposite side of the target), tension waves reflect back and create spalling. The greater the mismatch, the greater the effect of creasing and spalling will be. A charge initiated against a wall with air behind it will do more damage to the wall than a charge initiated against a wall with soil behind it.