
In mathematics, and specifically in number theory, a divisor function is an arithmetical function related to the divisors of an integer. When referred to as the divisor function, it counts the number of divisors of an integer. It appears in a number of remarkable identities, including relationships on the Riemann zeta function and the Eisenstein series of modular forms. Divisor functions were studied by Ramanujan, who gave a number of important congruences and identities.
A related function is the divisor summatory function, which, as the name implies, is a sum over the divisor function.
The sum of positive divisors function σx(n) is defined as the sum of the xth powers of the positive divisors of n, or
\sigmax(n)=\sumd|ndx.
The notations d(n) and
\tau(n)
For example, σ0(12) is the number of the divisors of 12:
\sigma0(12)
=10+20+30+40+60+120
=1+1+1+1+1+1=6.
while σ1(12) is the sum of all the divisors:
\sigma1(12)
=11+21+31+41+61+121
=1+2+3+4+6+12=28.
and the aliquot sum s(12) of proper divisors is:
s(12)
=11+21+31+41+61
=1+2+3+4+6=16.
| n | Divisors | σ0(n) | σ1(n) | Aliquot sum |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| 2 | 1,2 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 3 | 1,3 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
| 4 | 1,2,4 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| 5 | 1,5 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
| 6 | 1,2,3,6 | 4 | 12 | 6 |
| 7 | 1,7 | 2 | 8 | 1 |
| 8 | 1,2,4,8 | 4 | 15 | 7 |
| 9 | 1,3,9 | 3 | 13 | 4 |
| 10 | 1,2,5,10 | 4 | 18 | 8 |
| 11 | 1,11 | 2 | 12 | 1 |
| 12 | 1,2,3,4,6,12 | 6 | 28 | 16 |
| 13 | 1,13 | 2 | 14 | 1 |
| 14 | 1,2,7,14 | 4 | 24 | 10 |
| 15 | 1,3,5,15 | 4 | 24 | 9 |
For a prime number p,
d(p)=2
d(pn)=n+1
\sigma(p)=p+1
d(pn\#)=2n
Clearly, 1 < d(n) < n and σ(n) > n for all n > 2.
The divisor function is multiplicative, but not completely multiplicative. The consequence of this is that, if we write
n=
| r | |
| \prod | |
| i=1 |
| ai | |
| p | |
| i |
r=\omega(n)
\sigmax(n)=
| r | |
| \prod | |
| i=1 |
| ||||||||||
|
which is equivalent to the useful formula:
\sigmax(n)=
| r | |
| \prod | |
| i=1 |
| ai | |
| \sum | |
| j=0 |
| jx | |
| p | |
| i |
=
| r | |
| \prod | |
| i=1 |
(1+
| x | |
| p | |
| i |
+
| 2x | |
| p | |
| i |
+...+
| aix | |
| p | |
| i |
).
It follows (by setting x = 0) that
d(n)
| r | |
| d(n)=\prod | |
| i=1 |
(ai+1).
For example, if n is 24, there are two prime factors (p1 is 2; p2 is 3); noting that 24 is the product of 23×31, a1 is 3 and a2 is 1. Thus we can calculate
d(24)
d(24)
=
2 \prod i=1 (ai+1)
=(3+1)(1+1)=4 x 2=8.
The eight divisors counted by this formula are 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 6, 12, and 24.
We also note
s(n)=\sigma(n)-n
s(n)
s(n)=n
As an example, for two distinct primes p and q, let
n=pq.
Then
\phi(n)=(p-1)(q-1)=n+1-(p+q),
\sigma(n)=(p+1)(q+1)=n+1+(p+q).
In 1984, Roger Heath-Brown proved that
d(n) = d(n + 1)
will occur infinitely often.
The divisor function can be written as a finite trigonometric series
\sigmax(n)=\sum
| n | |
| \mu=1 |
\mux-1
| \mu | ||
| \sum | \cos | |
| \nu=1 |
| 2\pi\nun | |
| \mu |
n
Two Dirichlet series involving the divisor function are:
| infty | |
| \sum | |
| n=1 |
| \sigmaa(n) | |
| ns |
=\zeta(s)\zeta(s-a)
| infty | |
| \sum | |
| n=1 |
| \sigmaa(n)\sigmab(n) | = | |
| ns |
| \zeta(s)\zeta(s-a)\zeta(s-b)\zeta(s-a-b) | |
| \zeta(2s-a-b) |
.
A Lambert series involving the divisor function is:
| infty | |
| \sum | |
| n=1 |
qn\sigmaa(n)=
| infty | |
| \sum | |
| n=1 |
| naqn | |
| 1-qn |
In little-o notation, the divisor function satisfies the inequality (see page 296 of Apostol’s book)
forall\epsilon>0, d(n)=o(n\epsilon).
\limsupn\toinfty
| logd(n) | |
| logn/loglogn |
=log2.
\liminfn\toinftyd(n)=2.
In Big-O notation, Dirichlet showed that the average order of the divisor function satisfies the following inequality (see Theorem 3.3 of Apostol’s book)
forallx\geq1,\sumn\leqd(n)=xlogx+(2\gamma-1)x+O(\sqrt{x}),
\gamma
O(\sqrt{x})
The behaviour of the sigma function is irregular. The growth rate of the sigma function can be expressed by:
\limsupn → infty
| \sigma(n) | |
| nloglogn |
=e\gamma,
where lim sup is the limit superior. This result is Grönwall's theorem, published in 1913.
In 1984 Guy Robin proved that
\sigma(n)<e\gammanloglogn
A related bound was given by Jeffrey Lagarias in 2002, who proved that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that
\sigma(n)\leHn+
| Hn | |
| ln(H | |
| n)e |
Hn